When you're at a writer's colony, time moves differently.
It moves more slowly, more smoothly. And it stretches out, so 10 days feels like a month.
That's partly because of the solitude. If you're not used to spending time alone, in silence, with only crickets for company, 10 days can feel like a long time.
But because of how slowly time moves, you can complete more work and develop more ideas in 10 days than you would at home in a month or even two. Or maybe it's the other way around, that the massive amounts of creating causes time to creep?
As I wrap up my third visit to The Hambidge Center, I'm paying close attention to why I'm able to get so much work done here – because I want to be able to replicate that at home.
The main reason, I think, is the lack of distractions.
No phone calls. No email. No doctor's appointments. No errands. No lunch dates. None of the little distractions that eat into your work time at home. No one's even allowed to show up uninvited at my studio in the woods, so I know I have the entire day to myself.
And for those of you who have dogs to walk and kids to look after, there are none of those here, either.
I can't totally ignore my email because my business is still running like normal; I'm still serving clients and selling digital guides. But because I have no email (or phone signal) in my studio, and because I have to walk a quarter of a mile to access the Internet, I'm much more deliberate with my time online. I spend an hour going through email and responding to requests and putting out fires. And then I'm OFF email for the rest of the day.
And know what I'm realizing? That block of Internet time is enough.
Some days, when I'm waiting for correspondence, I need to check email twice or even three times. And sometimes I need to spend more than an hour because my tasks require online access. But in between those small blocks of time online, I don't truly need the Internet. (And if I do, I keep a running list of little things I'll do once I'm online again.)
The truth is, most everything and everyone can wait a few hours. Almost nothing is as urgent as I usually make it by keeping my email open all day and responding immediately to each inquiry.
I like to keep my email as empty as possible at all times because it makes me feel like my life is in order, like I'm caught up on everything. But perhaps I'm setting a bad precedent by always responding so quickly. Perhaps I'm setting an unhealthy expectation.
There is something special about focusing on work for more than half an hour, an hour, even two hours consecutively. Don't get me wrong; I work plenty of hours each day when I'm home, but it's not uninterrupted work. Writing and creating is kind of like sleep – you don't get the deep kind, the REM kind, until you've been in it for a while, without being woken. And you don't come up with the really smart ideas until you hit REM.
When I think of it that way, it seems like a tragedy that I often deprive myself of REM work when I'm home. It's like I'm robbing myself of my best creations.
Lots of people preach working in uninterrupted blocks of time for optimum productivity, but I've never truly tried it at home. I always find myself distracted – by an item that needs a spot on my calendar, a blog post idea that begs to be fleshed out, an email from a reader who had an ah-ha moment while reading one of my guides. I stick to this multi-tasking routine because it allows me to work via stream of consciousness, to grasp good ideas when they find me. But sometimes, I get so sucked into all those tasks that I forget what I was creating to begin with.
So I'm wondering: what would happen if I forced myself to focus on ONE project for two or three hours, without even the slightest detour? Or if I answered email only during one or two blocks of designated time each day?
What if YOU tried that strategy?
Would you get more done? Would you produce better work?
Would we be able to replicate the super creativity and productivity I experience here at the writer's colony?
What do you think?